Questioning Others' Patriotism Very Unpatriotic

Throughout this hectic election season, Barack Obama has had his patriotism questioned for various reasons, namely that he, for a time, didn't wear a flag lapel pin, and doesn't hold his hand over his heart during the Pledge or National Anthem.

But how can one question the patriotism of someone serving in the United States Senate while running for the highest office in all the land in good conscience?

I have had my patriotism questioned because of my liberal leanings (ok, it's more than leanings, but I digress), and those questioning my love for this country say that if I truly loved America, I would merely follow in what President Bush says should be done. They say that my questioning of George Bush is unpatriotic.

To that, I say, my questioning of the Republican leadership in Washington shows that I care about the direction of this country more than most people my age. I also usually point out that if it weren't for our Founding Fathers questioning King George, the American Revolution would never have taken place, and we would still be subservient to London.

Questioning political leaders and holding them accountable is one of the most patriotic acts a citizen of any country can undertake.

Questioning one's patriotism is one of the most unpatriotic things a citizen can do.

I think it is a wonderful thing that Barack Obama has defended his patriotism, while simultaneously praising the patriotism of his Republican opponent, John McCain.

That praise of McCain proves the character of Obama, and that he will be the different president most Americans have been clamoring for.

Under the Bush Administration, several conservative commentators have questioned the loyalty of liberals, and others who do not agree with their ideology or that of George Bush and others within the Bush White House.

My hope is that under an Obama Administration, that sort of questioning ends. We cannot have a civilized, unified society if you have some questioning the loyalty of others.

We all love this great nation, liberals and conservatives alike, and the best way to show that love is to respect everyone elses love and loyalty to the Stars and Stripes without question.

Bush Administration's clandestine operation in Iran can't be a good sign.

The New Yorker has learned that the Bush Administration has launched covert operations within Iran, and Congress authorized $400 million to fund the operation.

It's hardly a secret that the administration's next target for military operations is Iran. The Bush White House is already beating the war drums, and Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain isn't doing anything to quiet those drums.

They are engaging in similar methods of misleading the American public about the "threat" Iran poses, just as they did in 2002 and 2003 prior to the invasion of Iraq.

Anyone who thinks an invasion of Iran would go better than the Iraq invasion did is clearly delusional.

Seymour Hersh, who wrote the piece in the New Yorker, said that the Bush Administration wants to either attack Iran or force it to stop its weapons program via other means before Bush's term is up in January of 2009.

If the Bush Administration decides to attack Iran, it would leave the next president with three messy wars and an even more depleted military.

It would also re-ignite the passions of the terrorists who would bring us harm.

Bush has said that the Iranians have been stoking sectarian violence in Iraq. He easily can use that as an excuse for invading Iran without waiting for the nuclear issue to work itself out via diplomatic means.

It is up to Democratic leaders in Congress to delay a possible invasion of Iran until after Bush leaves office. The last thing our military needs is another unnecessary war when the military is already taxed as it is with two wars being fought.

Our nation cannot afford another invasion, literally and figuratively. Whatever has to be done to keep American troops out of Iran must be done.